Federal Courts Reports
Symbol of the Government of Canada

SEE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT PrintPrinter Friendly Page

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Exclusion and Removal

Inadmissible Persons

Mo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

IMM-4082-98

2001 FCT 66, O'Keefe J.

14/2/01

23 pp.

Application for judicial review of visa officer's decision refusing applicant's permanent residence application on ground applicant's son, Kok Ho Wong, medically inadmissible--Applicant applied for permanent residence status under Investor Class on February 26, 1997--Medical Notification by medical officer, Dr. Axler, concluding requirement for special education considered excessive demand on social services--Dr. Kennedy not one of medical officers involved with assessment of applicant's son--Contents of two Kennedy affidavits not admissible in that facts therein not within personal knowledge of Dr. Kennedy as required by r. 81(1)--Whether medical officer's decision reached in error, thereby impugning visa officer's decision --Merely suffering from disease, disorder not rendering person inadmissible--Effect of disease critical to determination--Excessive demand defined as "more than normal"--Visa officer can, should ask whether circumstances of case indicate in fact probable excessive demand on health, social services--Assessment individual assessment which must consider each applicant's personal circumstances--Medical opinion herein including patently unreasonable error of fact in that information available to medical officers not that applicant's son, Kok Ho Wong, required special care, constant supervision--Evidence referred to by Court establishing opposite conclusion--Patently unreasonable error of fact resulting in error of jurisdiction--Opinion not valid opinion under Immigration Act, s. 19(1)(a)(ii)--Visa officer committed reviewable error based on invalid medical opinion to arrive at decision to deny visas to applicant, family--Application allowed--Federal Court Rules, 1998, SOR/98-106, r. 81--Immigration Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. I-2, s. 19 (as am. by R.S.C., 1985 (3rd Supp.), c. 30, s. 3; S.C. 1992, c. 47, s. 77; idem, c. 49, ss. 11, 122(c),(d); 1995, c. 15, s. 2; 1996, c. 19, s. 83; 2000, c. 24, s. 55).