Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Canadian Jewish Congress v. Chosen People Ministries, Inc., [2003] 1 F.C. 29 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-406-02, [2003] 1 F.C. 29), reasons for judgment handed down 18/6/03.

Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2003] 1 F.C. 423 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-442-02, 2003 FCA 138). The reasons for judgment, handed down 14/3/03, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

Copello v. Canada (Minister of Foreign Affairs), [2002] 3 F.C. 24 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-11-02, ), reasons for judgment handed down 3/7/03.

Lavigne v. Canada (Human Resources Development), [2002] 2 F.C. 164 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-10-02, [2003] 1 F.C. 29), reasons for judgment handed down 5/5/03.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Canada (Information Commissioner), [2002] 3 F.C. 606 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-82-02, [2002] 3 F.C. 606), reasons for judgment handed down 25/6/03.

Zrig v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 F.C. 559 (T.D.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-33-02, [2002] 1 F.C. 559). The reasons for judgment, handed down 7/4/03, will be published in the Federal Court Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Barrie Public Utilities v. Canadian Cable Television Assn., [2001] 4 F.C. 237 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 16/5/03, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Applications for leave to appeal

Goldfarb v. W.L. Gore & Associates Inc., A-163-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 697, Noël J.A., judgment dated 4/12/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 10/7/03.

Byer v. Canada, A-624-01, [2001] 3 F.C. 449, Décary J.A., judgment dated 8/11/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. Canmar Fortune (The), [2001] 2 F.C. D-23 (C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 1/5/03, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Bakht v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development), A-226-01, [2001] 3 F.C. 449, Noël J.A., judgment dated 13/6/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 20/3/03.

Byer v. Canada, A-249-02, [2001] 3 F.C. 449, Décary J.A., judgment dated 8/11/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Miller v. Canada (Attorney General), A-137-01, 2002 FCA 370, judgment of the Court dated 7/10/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/4/03.

S.T.B. Holdings Ltd. v. Canada, A-747-01, [2003] 1 F.C. 402, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 15/10/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Kibale v. Canada, A-150-01, [2003] 1 F.C. 271, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 4/10/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 15/5/03.

Ontario Assn. of Architects v. Assn. of Architectural Technologists of Ontario, [2003] 1 F.C. 331 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Cooper v. Canada (Attorney General), A-748-01, 2002 FCA 374, Linden J.A., judgment dated 9/10/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 24/4/03.

Jurak v. Canada, A-22-02, 2002 FCA 58, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 3/2/03 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 10/7/03.

Pearson v. Canada, A-76-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 514, Linden J.A., judgment dated 11/9/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Water's Edge Village Estates (Phase II) Ltd. c. Canada, [2003] 2 C.F. 25 (C.A.), autorisation de pourvoi à la C.S.C. refusée, 20-3-03.

Granbury Developments Ltd. v. Canada, A-677-00, 2002 FCA 438, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 5/11/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/4/03.

Deigan v. Canada (Industry), A-240-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 697, judgment of the Court dated 25/6/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to the S.C.C. refused, 20/3/03.

McFadyen v. Canada, A-623-00, [2003] 1 F.C. 271, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 11/12/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 24/4/03.

Setlur v. Canada (Attorney General), A-84-02, 2002 FCA 463, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 21/11/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/4/03.

Cléroux v. Canada (Attorney General), A-271-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 697, Evans J.A., judgment dated 10/6/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 6/3/03.

Pearson v. Canada, A-377-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 514, Linden J.A., judgment dated 11/9/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Cervinus Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Agriculture), A-34-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 697, Noël J.A., judgment dated 22/10/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/4/03.

M.N.R. v. Gadbois, A-64-01, [2003] 1 F.C. 271, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 31/5/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/4/03.

Cormier v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources), A-681-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 697, Evans J.A., judgment dated 18/12/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/7/03.

Hodge v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development), [2003] 1 F.C. 271 (C.A.), leave to appeal to the S.C.C. refused, 20/3/03.

Dupont Canada Inc. v. Canada, A-527-99, [2003] 2 F.C. 697, Richard C.J., judgment dated 22/11/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 15/5/03.

Manson Estate v. M.N.R., A-479-00, [2003] 1 F.C. 271, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 3/10/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Penner International Inc. v. Canada, [2003] 2 F.C. 581 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 15/5/03.

Syntex (U.S.A.) L.L.C. v. Canada (Minister of Health), [2003] 1 F.C. D-31 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 20/3/03.

Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police), [2001] 3 F.C. 70 (C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 6/3/03, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

SmithKline Beecham Pharma Inc. v. Apotex Inc., [2003] 1 F.C. 118 (C.A.), leave to appeal to the S.C.C. refused, 20/3/03.

Water's Edge Village Estates (Phase II) Ltd. v. Canada, [2003] 2 F.C. 25 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 20/3/03.

Morissette v. Canada (Treasury Board), A-141-00, 2002 FCA 314, Desjardins J.A., judgment dated 9/9/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 24/4/03.

Pictou v. Canada, [2003] 2 F.C. 738 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 26/6/03.

Bell Canada v. Canada (Human Rights Commission), [2001] 3 F.C. 481 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 26/6/03, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Gifford v. Canada, A-191-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 697, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 12/8/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser, [2003] 2 F.C. 165 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted, 8/5/03.

Suchon v. Canada, A-653-01, [2002] 4 F.C. 3, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 3/7/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/4/03.

Ross v. Canada, A-238-02, [2003] 1 F.C. 402, Décary J.A., judgment dated 3/10/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 15/5/03.

Byer v. Canada, A-214-02, [2001] 3 F.C. 449, Décary J.A., judgment dated 8/11/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Parke-Davis Division v. Canada (Minister of Health), [2003] 2 F.C. 514 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 22/5/03.

Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), [2003] 1 F.C. 402 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Lesiuk, [2003] 2 F.C. 697 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/7/03.

Chalifoux v. Driftpile First Nation, A-559-01, [2003] 2 F.C. 697, Desjardins J.A., judgment dated 23/12/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 17/7/03.

Markevich v. Canada, [2001] 3 F.C. 449 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 6/3/03, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Assn. of Internet Providers, [2002] 4 F.C. 3 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

AB Hassle v. Canada (Minister of National Health and Welfare), A-716-01, [2001] 3 F.C. 449, Sexton J.A., judgment dated 1/11/02 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

Canada v. Whitney, [2003] 1 F.C. D-18 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 27/3/03.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.