Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Canada v. Loewen

T-819-90

Dubé J.

8/2/93

15 pp.

Appeal from Tax Court of Canada decision as to whether $40,000 gain on redemption of Scientific Research Tax Credit debenture (SRTC) income or capital gain-Taxpayer, general accountant, seeking tax shelter-SRTC debenture purchased in July 1984 from Dynaflex Industries (Dynaflex) for $200,000 with redemption price of $140,000 and deemed cost of $100,000 under Income Tax Act, s. 127.3(6)-On demand, Dynaflex would pay $140,000 in full to taxpayer-Designation made by Dynaflex in August 1984 under Act, s. 194(4) allowing taxpayer to use tax credit of $102,000 for 1984 taxation year-Taxpayer asking redemption on January 2, 1985-Amount of $140,000 paid to him from lawyer's trust account-Late filing of prescribed election forms with respect to disposition of SRTC debenture-Out-of-pocket cost to taxpayer for Dynaflex debenture $60,000 for tax credit of $102,000-Four Tax Court of Canada decisions involving SRTC program, evenly divided as to nature of gain-English decisions relied on by TCC judge involving forward stripping of dividends, not determinative as question raised distinguishable-Taxpayer herein not retaining debenture to earn interest income, requesting redemption as soon as debenture paid in full-Final payment representing bulk of purchase price never in hands of Dynaflex to be invested in operations-Purchase of debenture intended to earn profit-Transaction not investment, rather legitimate profit-making scheme, adventure in nature of trade-Sum of $40,000 taxable income in taxpayer's 1985 taxation year-Act, s. 39(4) not allowing late filing of election-Taxpayer's late election not valid-Appeal allowed-Income Tax Act, S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63, ss. 39(4) (as enacted by S.C. 1977-78, c. 1, s. 16(2)), 127.3(2)(a) (as enacted by S.C. 1983-84, c. 1, s. 73(1)), 127.3(6) (as enacted idem), 194(4) (as amended idem, s. 95(1)), 248(1) (as am. by S.C. 1979, c. 5, s. 66(3)).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.