Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Moutisheva v. Canada ( Minister of Employment and Immigration )

A-808-91

Létourneau J.A.

29/9/93

9 pp.

Application made pursuant to R. 1733 to reverse judgment of Court dismissing applicant's appeal -- Latter argued not informed either by their counsel or Court of existence of application to dismiss appeal -- Alleged that under R. 1308(2) application to dismiss appeal should have been served on applicants personally, not merely on counsel -- Argument contrary to wording and scheme of R. 1308 and to scheme of Federal Court Rules -- R. 1308(2) not requiring service in person of application to dismiss -- No proof of intent to commit fraud by respondent -- Latter observed applicable rules of procedure -- Not sufficient evidence to show applicants' counsel guilty of fraudulent acts toward them -- Failure to inform clients of existence of application to dismiss appeal cannot constitute fraud on Court vitiating dismissal judgment rendered by it-Court could validly dispose of application to dismiss appeal under R. 324 -- Applicants did not demonstrate reasonable diligence required to have judgment quashed under R. 1733 -- Application dismissed -- Federal Court Rules, C.R.C., c. 663, RR. 324, 1308, 1733.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.