Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Gauthier v. Canada ( Minister of Consumer and Corporate Affairs )

T-468-92

Reed J.

16/11/92

4 pp.

Application to review decisions of Privacy Commissioner pursuant to Privacy Act, s. 41 -- Respondent seeking order striking parts of motion for review requesting review of Commissioner's decision under Privacy Act, ss. 7, 8 -- Ss. 7, 8 prohibiting disclosure of information concerning individual without individual's consent unless information used for purpose consistent with purpose for which obtained -- Complaint concerning improper disclosure of personal information about Gauthier from one branch of government department to another branch of same department -- Respondent arguing as no refusal of access to personal information, Court lacking jurisdiction to review matter concerning complaint of improper disclosure -- Respondent's motion allowed -- X v. Canada (Minister of National Defence), [1991] 1 F.C. 670 (T.D.) applied -- Limited scope of review given to courts by Privacy Act criticized by C. H. H. McNairn and C. D. Woodbury in Government Information: Access and Privacy, Don Mills, Ont.: DeBoo, 1989 -- Act expressly precluding complainants starting regular action for damages based on negligence -- Ss. 67(1), 74 expressly providing exemption from criminal or civil proceedings for anything done in good faith -- House of Commons Standing Committee reviewing both Access to Information Act and Privacy Act, expressing concern over lack of remedies available to those alleging improper disclosure of personal information -- Recommending creation and clarification of remedies available to persons alleging lack of compliance under Acts: Open and Shut: Enhancing the Right to Know and the Right to Privacy: Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Solicitor General on the Review of the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act, Queen's Printer for Canada, 1987 -- Privacy Act, R.S.C., 1985, ss. 7, 8, 41, 67, 74.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.