Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Feherguard products Ltd. v. Rocky's of B.C. Leisure Ltd.

T-1602-86

Rouleau J.

7/10/92

5 pp.

Application to remove Bereskin & Parr as solicitors for plaintiff based on possible conflict on interest -- Timothy J. Sinnott practising with Barrigar & Oyen, Toronto in 1988 when conducted discovery of officer of plaintiff company as agent for Barrigar & Oyen, Vancouver, solicitors for defendant -- Received instructions disclosing litigation strategy -- In 1991 joined Bereskin & Parr -- Peter R. Everitt, having conduct of plaintiff's action, swearing no communication or involvement by Sinnott in relation to file -- Application dismissed -- Application of guidelines to avoid conflicts of interest outlined in MacDonald Estate v. Martin, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235 -- Sinnott remembering little if anything of previous involvement -- No information of confidential nature disclosed except instructions for discovery -- Little could be used to defendant's detriment -- As to misuse of information, Sinnott neither acting nor actively engaged in file -- Too strict to impute his knowledge to others in firm, and unrealistic in era of mega-firms -- All reasonable measures taken by other members of law firm -- Defendant's solicitors aware of situation for long time before seeking protection -- Unreasonable to require plaintiff to instruct new counsel at this late date and bear additional expense.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.