Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Citizenship and Immigration                                                                                                                                        

Immigration Practice

Application for stay of removal order—Enforcement officer deciding not to defer removal until sponsored H&C application for permanent residence decided—Exercise of discretion concerning right to defer considered—Applicant making out serious issues: (1) Enforcement officer failing to apply proper test to gauge point in time to calculate how long H&C application outstanding; (2) Enforcement officer failing to take into account applicant’s surrounding compelling personal circumstances; and (3) Enforcement officer misreading medical evidence—Applicant making out irreparable harm if stay not granted—In this case, irreparable harm having two aspects: harm to the applicant and harm to the family unit—Balance of convenience favouring applicant—Application allowed.

Bhagat v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) (IMM-44-09, 2009 FC 45, Lemieux J., order dated January 20, 2009, 10 pp.)

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.