Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Lemieux v. Canada ( Labour Affairs Officer, Human Resources Development )

T-45-95

Tremblay-Lamer J.

27/3/96

10 pp.

Judicial review of labour affairs officer's decision on complaint of unjust dismissal-After applicant's term employment contract renewed number of times, notified in writing, within required time, contract not renewed-Applicant filed complaint of unjust dismissal with Labour Canada under Canada Labour Code, ss. 240 ff.-Respondent labour affairs officer assigned to investigate case-After investigation, refused to grant applicant's request he report to Minister of Labour so adjudicator could be appointed-Officer considered failure to renew contract for fixed term of employment not dismissal within meaning of Code-Applicant argued only adjudicator under s. 242 has jurisdiction to determine whether dismissal occurred; inspector cannot make determination-Application for judicial review dismissed-Dismissal precondition for being eligible to make complaint under Code, s. 240(1)-Despite Parliament's silence thereon, inspector's responsibility to refuse complaint where in fact no dismissal-Canada Labour Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. L-2, ss. 240 (as am. by R.S.C., 1985 (1st Supp.), c. 9, s. 15), 242 (as am. idem, s. 16).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.