Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

A-1130-82
CNCP Telecommunications (Appellant) (Appli- cant)
v.
Alberta Government Telephones and Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Com mission (Respondents) (Respondents)
Court of Appeal, Pratte, Ryan JJ. and Lalande D.J.—Montreal, March 16, 1983.
Practice — Joinder of parties — Appeal from refusal to allow CNCP's application to be joined as respondent in prohi bition proceedings instituted by Alberta Government Tele phones — Appeal allowed — When motion made for prohibi tion in Trial Division, applicant before tribunal is necessary party regardless of grounds for prohibition.
COUNSEL:
C. R. O. Munro, Q.C. and M. H. Ryan for appellant (applicant).
J. D. Rooke for respondent (respondent) Alberta Government Telephones.
G. A. van Koughnett and D. J. Rennie for respondent (respondent) Canadian Radio- television and Telecommunications Commis sion.
SOLICITORS:
Canadian Pacific Law Department, Montreal, for appellant (applicant).
Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer, Calgary, for respondent (respondent) Alberta Government Telephones.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada for respondent (respondent) Canadian Radio- television and Telecommunications Commis sion.
The following are the reasons for judgment of the Court delivered orally in English by
PRATTE J.: We are all of the view that when a motion for prohibition is made in the Trial Divi sion in order to prevent a tribunal from hearing an application, the applicant before the tribunal is a
necessary party to the motion for prohibition. And this remains true, in our opinion, whatever be the grounds urged in support of the motion for prohibition.
It follows that the learned motion Judge ought not to have rejected the appellant's motion to be added as a party respondent to the prohibition proceedings commenced by Alberta Government Telephones. The appeal will therefore be allowed with costs in this Court and in the Court below, the decision of the Trial Division will be set aside and the appellant will be added as a party respond ent to the prohibition proceedings instituted by Alberta Government Telephones.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.